Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sir Edmund's avatar

It is difficult to understand why Councilmembers Matthew and Jun would approve and vote in favor of a budget (how much to spend) and then minutes later, propose a much lower tax rate (requiring spending cuts of as much as $2.7 million) unless, like so many politicians these days, they lack the courage to identify specific spending cuts, and prefer only to engage in gross posturing (“look at me, I’m a fiscal hawk”).

They knew both items were on the agenda. They knew the vote on the spending would come first. They didn’t propose a single spending cut and approved the amount to be spent and the items to be paid for without comment. But they expect the voters to be fooled by their meaningless show of concern for the tax rate?

Both also campaigned on increasing the property tax exemption, but not once during this budget cycle (Matthew’s 4th and Jun’s 1st) did they propose such an increase or identify either the budget cuts, fee increases or tax rate increases that would allow for an increase in the property tax exemption while balancing the books. Just more hollow posturing from typical politicians.

Expand full comment
Diane Williams's avatar

Parents playing Russian roulette with their children's lives. Very sad!

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts